by Edward Hutcheson

There are some who are ardent supporters of the Gay Agenda and lifestyle, to the extent that they see themselves as the final arbiters of intelligence and common sense. The current  back and forth with Pastor Munroe and Minister Mitchell is a clear display that those who speak of equality and human rights are very intolerant, when it comes to “looking at what the public is seeing”.  The public often makes the mistake of seeing the arguments as being equal, and Minister Fred Mitchell is very persuasive in his presentations of what is fair; but he fails to make sense  when you look for a moral basis that can be fairly applied, especially as those with a “preferential moral responsibility” want to set the rules for every one else.

Although he continues to overstep the boundaries of his office when he is on a “particular” subject, he seems to have the full support of his Party and strange to many – even the Chairman. The public has been comforted in some respects to see that all in the Party do not agree with Mr.Mitchell and Mr.Roberts, but knowing  the political nature of the people we elect, this may be all show.

There can never be equality when it comes to same-sex partnerships and heterosexual partnerships. The former if taken to its logical conclusion results in extinction; there may be an argument for the amount of care that is espoused by those who support the LGBTIQA ( Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Transgendered,  Intersexual, Queer and Allied)  agenda, but the argument fails when they attempt to cross the line by telling the heterosexual population that they are “homophobic” because they object to their children being indoctrinated into the homosexual lifestyle through “sensitivity programming”.

Mr. Mitchell is trying to get his foot in the door of public perception, but he is going to need a cast for that leg if he continues (figurative expression! figurative expression!). Here are the arguments that he and those who support the Gay lifestyle will never have an answer for: If some persons  are born Homosexuals, why would those who object have to be indoctrinated?- Why the two dads or two moms programs? And,  If some persons are born homosexuals, why do we have persons who “were homosexual” and are now “straight”?

The biggest problem in the human race is selfishness, and this is applicable to all people and those inclinations are not  restricted  to ones’ sexual orientation, but when  preferences and methods are seen as  obligatory without a transcendent framework that can be applied equally to all – there is going to be a problem. If a Christian minority is facing daily opposition in promoting what is morally right, can the LGBTIQA  expect any less with an agenda that is diametrically opposed? In their espousal of   preferences that go against an established moral framework; shaky as it is. Minister Mitchell and those who support his efforts  should take their cues from what is going on inside this country, instead of looking abroad for excuses, as they are fully aware that the societal cultures that they are importing their “impetus” from, are fracturing and imploding. The tail cannot wag the dog. (Did I just call the nation a dog?)

Under the guise of having a rational discussion the Minister of Foreign affairs is seeking to introduce a perspective to this country that will not gain traction; he has complained of his political career being hindered because of his views on this issue; a person with his articulation should have sense enough to know that this conversation has more depth that his superficial complaining.

March 11, 2014